Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Τρίτη 29 Οκτωβρίου 2013

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ BORODIN ~










~ BORODIN ~ 







*Christos Sipsis

~Borodin ~ Symphony No. 3 in A minor ~ 
Ο
Ρωσος συνθετης αρχισε να δουλευει το συγκεκριμενο εργο το 1882. Ωστοσο
μεχρι τον θανατο του (1887) δεν προλαβε να ολοκληρωσει ουτε καν τα 2
πρωτα μερη. Αυτα τα δυο μερη (I. Moderato assai II. Scherzo. Vivo)
θα συμπληρωσει, ενορχηστρωσει και εκδοσει στη Λειψια το 1888 ο
Aleksandr Glazunov. Τα οργανα ειναι τα εξης: 2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2
clarinets in A, 2 bassoons, 4 horns in F, 2 trumpets in A and B♭, 3
trombones, timpani, strings.

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ MAHLER ~







GUSTAV MAHLER








Gustav Mahler - Symphony No. 10
Μια
απο τις πιο γνωστες ημιτελεις συμφωνιες ειναι η 10 του Gustav Mahler. Ο
μεγαλος Αυστριακος συνθετης αρχισε να την δουλευει τον Ιούλιο του
1910 και σταματησε τον Σεπτεμβριο του ιδιου ετους, λιγους μηνες πριν να
πεθανει (Μαιο του 11). Προλαβε να επεξεργαστει ικανοποιητικα μονο το 1ο
(Andante -- Adagio:) απο τα 5 μερη Το μερος αυτο ακουμε εδω απο δυο μεγαλους μαεστρους: Τον Μπερνσταιν και τον
Μπουλεζ.


Mahler
started his work on his Tenth Symphony in July 1910 in Toblach, and
ended his efforts in September the same year. He never managed to
complete the orchestral draft before his premature death at the age of
fifty from a streptococcal infection of the blood.Mahler's
drafts and sketches for the Tenth Symphony comprise 72 pages of full
score, 50 pages of continuous short score draft (2 pages of which are
missing), and a further 44 pages of preliminary drafts, sketches, and
inserts. In the form in which Mahler left it, the symphony consists of
five movements:1. Andante -- Adagio: 275 bars drafted in orchestral and short score.2. Scherzo: 522 bars drafted in orchestral and short score.3.
Purgatorio. Allegro moderato: 170 bars drafted in short score, the
first 30 bars of which were also drafted in orchestral score.4. Scherzo. Nicht zu schnell]: about 579 bars drafted in short score.5. Finale. Langsam, schwer: 400 bars drafted in short score.
Mahler: Adagio from Symphony no. 10 (Cleveland Orchestra, Boulez)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PQT5IK8mwA&feature=youtu.be 
The
parts in short score were usually in four staves. The designations of
some movements were altered as work progressed: for example the second
movement was initially envisaged as a finale. The fourth movement was
also relocated in multiple instances. 
Mahler then started on an orchestral draft of the symphony, which
begins to bear some signs of haste after the halfway point of the first
movement. He had gotten as far as orchestrating the first two movements
and the opening 30 bars of the third movement when he had to put aside
work on the Tenth to make final revisions to the Ninth Symphony.The
circumstances surrounding the composition of the Tenth were highly
unusual. Mahler was at the height of his compositional powers, but his
personal life was in complete disarray, most recently compounded by the
revelation that his young wife Alma had had an affair with the architect
Walter Gropius. Mahler sought counselling from Sigmund Freud, and on
the verge of its successful première in Munich, dedicated the Eighth
Symphony to Alma in a desperate attempt to repair the breach. The
unsettled frame of Mahler's mind found expression in the despairing
comments (many addressed to Alma) written on the manuscript of the
Tenth, and must have influenced its composition:
 on the final page of
the short score in the final movement, Mahler wrote, "für dich leben!
für dich sterben!" (To live for you! To die for you!) and the
exclamation "Almschi!" underneath the last soaring phrase.

Mahler - Symphony No. 10 i. Adagio

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ BRUCKNER ~





~ BRUCKNER ~ 




*Christos Sipsis
Η ημιτελης που θα ακουσουμε σημερα ειναι η (εκπληκτική ) 9η του Anton Bruckner . Ο μεγαλος Αυστριακος πρόλαβε να ολοκληρωσει τα τρια πρωτα μερη της συμφωνιας του. Το τελευταιο μερος (αν και απο ορισμενα σημεια εχουμε ακομα και την ενορχήστρωση) παρεμεινε ημιτελες. Την ακουμε απο τον Eugen Jochum.
  Bruckner Symphony No 9 D minor Eugen Jochum Berlin RSO
Anton Bruckner's Symphony No. 9 in D minor is the last symphony upon which he worked, leaving the last movement incomplete at the time of his death in 1896. The symphony was premiered under Ferdinand Löwe in Vienna in 1903, after Bruckner's death. Bruckner dedicated this symphony "to the beloved God" (in German, "dem lieben Gott").(While it may seem logical to call this work "Symphony in D minor, opus posthumous," that usually refers to the Symphony No. 0 in D minor).DescriptionThe symphony has four movements, although the fourth is incomplete and fragmentary. Of this finale, it seems that much material in full score may have been lost very soon after the composer's death, and therefore large sections exist only in two-stave sketch format. The placement of the Scherzo second, and the key, D minor, are only two elements this work has in common with Beethoven's Ninth Symphony.The symphony is so often performed without any sort of finale that some authors describe "the form of this symphony [as] ... a massive arch, two slow movements straddling an energetic Scherzo."[1]The score calls for three each of flutes, oboes, clarinets in B-flat and A (Adagio only), 2 bassoons and contrabassoon, with eight horns (5.–8. Hrn. doubling on Wagner tubas), three trumpets in F, three trombones, contrabass tuba, timpani and strings.Fourth movementBruckner had conceived the entire movement; whether the manuscripts he left would have made up the final form of the Finale is debatable. Several bifolios of the emerging autograph score survived, consecutively numbered by Bruckner himself, as well as numerous discarded bifolios and particellos sketches. The surviving manuscripts were all systematically ordered and published in a notable facsimile reprint, edited by J. A. Phillips, in the Bruckner Complete Edition, Vienna.Because of Bruckner's individual composing habits, reconstructing the Finale is in some ways easier, and in some ways harder, than it would be to reconstruct an unfinished piece by another composer. Compounding the problem, collectible hunters ransacked Bruckner's house soon after his death. Sketches for the Finale have been found as far away from Austria as Washington D.C.Large portions of the movement were almost completely orchestrated, and even some eminent sketches have been found for the coda (the initial crescendo/28 bars, and the progression towards the final cadence, even proceeding into the final tonic pedalpoint/in all 32 bars), but only hearsay suggesting the coda would have integrated themes from all four movements: The Bruckner scholars Max Graf and Max Auer reported that they have actually seen such a sketch when they had access to the manuscripts, at that time in the possession of Franz Schalk. Today such a sketch appears to be lost.More importantly than the loss of the score bifolios of the coda itself, composer and Bruckner scholar Robert Simpson asserts in his book The Essence of Bruckner, is that the sketches that survive do not support the momentum to support such a conclusion. Some people[who?] think that there is no real inner continuity or coherence inherent to indicate an organically growing musical structure. But in fact, the publications of the Bruckner-Gesamtausgabe edited by John Phillips revealed that Bruckner has left an emerging autograph score, numbered consecutively bifolio by bifolio, which constituted the intact score, at least up to the beginning of the coda. Around 50% of this final phase must be considered lost today.Bruckner knew he might not live to complete this symphony and suggested his Te Deum be played at the end of the concert. The presence in the sketches of the figuration heard in quarter-notes at the outset of the Te Deum led to a supposition that Bruckner was composing a link or transition between the two works. In fact, the sketch for such a transition can be found on two bifolios of the emerging autograph score. Some people think that at best this would have been a makeshift solution. The C major setting of the Te Deum conflicts with the D minor setting of the rest of the symphony. Because of this tonal clash, the Te Deum is rarely used as the Finale. However, others think it better to follow the composer's own wish and so argue against the tonal clash theory, since the Adagio ends in another key (E major) as well.
Symphony No. 9 (Bruckner) -      Wikipedia, the free encyclopedi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._9_(Bruckner)</a>Norbert Burgmuller - Symphony No. 2 Op. 11 I. Allegro Moderato (1/4)






ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ BIZET ~





~ BIZET ~





*Christos Sipsis

...η 2η συμφωνια του
Μπιζε , που ειναι πιο γνωστη ως Roma Symphony. Στην πραγματικότητα δεν
ειναι ημιτελης . Απλώς ο Μπιζε , παρα το γεγονός ότι την δουλευε 11
ολοκληρα χρόνια δεν μπ[ορεσε να καταληξει σε μια εκδοχη που θα τον
ικανοποιούσε. Δυστυχως δεν βρηκα στο διαδικτυο ολοκληρωμενο το συγκεκριμενο εργο. Ετσι θα περιοριστουμε σε 2 μονο μερη.



Μερος 1ο. Andante tranquillo Allegro agitato  
Bizet Georges - Andante tranquillo - Allegro agitato
http://youtu.be/OnqWXOV7K-I









The
Symphony in C "Roma" is the second of Georges Bizet's symphonies.
Unlike his first symphony, also in C major, which was written quickly at
the age of 17, Roma was written over an eleven-year span, between the
ages of 22 and 33 (he died at age 36). Bizet was never fully satisfied
with it, subjecting it to a number of revisions, but died before
finishing his definitive version. All four movements were performed in
his lifetime, but never all on the same occasion. The full symphony in
its latest revision was premiered in 1875, after his death.[1] It is
perhaps because of Bizet's dissatisfaction that the work is often said
to be "unfinished". However, in the form in which it exists today, it is
certainly finished and is fully scored. It has been recorded a number
of times but is not often heard on the concert platform.
Bizet
won the Prix de Rome in 1857, which required him to spend the following
two years studying free of charge at the French Academy in Rome,
followed by a year studying in Germany. He never went to Germany, but
stayed in Rome until July 1860.[2] Rather than returning to Paris
straight away, he did some touring through Italy, seeing places he had
not visited in his earlier travels in 1858 and 1859. In Rimini he first
planned a symphony with each of the four movements dedicated to a
different Italian city – Rome (opening movement), Venice (Andante),
Florence (Scherzo) and Naples (finale).[3] He may have made some early
sketches at this time. When he got to Venice he learned that his mother
was seriously ill, so he returned home immediately.[3]
By 1861
he had written the Scherzo, still generally considered the best
movement of the work. It was performed privately in November 1861, and
received a public performance on 11 January 1863, conducted by Jules
Pasdeloup at the Cirque Napoléon, at which Camille Saint-Saëns was
present. It was poorly performed and provoked a hostile reaction from
many concert subscribers. Nevertheless, it was given another performance
on 18 January at the Société Nationale des Beaux-Arts, and this time
received a much more positive reaction.[3]
By 1866 he had
written his first version of the complete work, in which the first
movement was a Theme and Variations,[4] but he was dissatisfied and set
about undertaking a total revision. In 1868 he revised it yet again.[3]
Three movements of the revised score, minus the Scherzo, were performed
on 28 February 1869, under the title Fantaisie symphonique: Souvenirs de
Rome, again conducted by Pasdeloup. The movements were given
programmatic titles Une chasse dans la Forêt d'Ostie, Une Procession and
Carnaval à Rome[4] (this was the movement meant to depict Naples). But
Bizet was still not happy, and proceeded to revise it once more. By 1871
he seems to have dropped work on his revisions, being focussed on other
projects.[1]
The full symphony in its latest known version was
premiered after his death, in 1875.[1] The work was published in 1880 as
Roma, and it probably incorporates some of his changes made in 1871.[3]
In
form, the work stands somewhere between a symphony and a symphonic
suite. Grove's Dictionary says: "It is not sufficiently explicit for
programme music and too carelessly constructed for an abstract
symphony".[3] Despite Bizet's description of it as a "symphony", it has
often been classified in reference works as a suite. In some sources, it
is even numbered as "Symphonic Suite No. 3".[5] Another reason for the
alternative title is that his earlier symphony was in the same key, C
major, and it was believed by some that calling his second symphonic
venture a suite would be less confusing.[5] However, this renaming could
only have occurred after 1935 (60 years after Bizet's death), when the
very existence of his first symphony, the Symphony in C, was made known
to the world for the first time.
Roma is a very
unequal work. The Scherzo is usually singled out as its best movement,
full of liveliness and grace. The outer movements contain both
brilliance and academic pedantry, and the slow movement is not generally
well regarded, sometimes being described as "ponderous and boring".[1]
However, Gustav Mahler thought highly enough of Roma to conduct the
Vienna premiere in 1898-99, and to expose American audiences to it on
his 1910 tour.[6] Its actual United States premiere was on 11 November
1880 at the Metropolitan Concert Hall, conducted by Theodore Thomas. The
New York Times critic of the time said that, while there was much in
the work to admire, it was crude in arrangement and had an air of
incompleteness about it.[7]
The four movements of Roma are:Andante tranquillo, leading to an Allegro agitato (C major)
Scherzo - Allegretto vivace
Andante molto (F major)Allegro vivacissimo (Finale).
The work takes about 31 minutes to play.
It
has been recorded a number of times, under conductors such as Sir
Thomas Beecham, Lamberto Gardelli, Louis Frémaux, Michel Plasson,
Jean-Claude Casadesus and Enrique Batiz.[8]
The Finale has sometimes been recorded separately, under the title "Carnaval",[9] or "Carnaval à Rome".[10]Roma Symphony (Bizet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roma_Symphony_(Bizet)
Georges Bizet - Carnaval - Riccardo Zadra Pianoforte
http://youtu.be/a-FcpHxgG1k

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ SCHUBERT ~






~ SCHUBERT ~ 







*Christos Sipsis

Οι περισσότεροι θα ξερετε ότι ο Σούμπερτ εχει μια ημιτελη - την 8η.Στην πραγματικότητα όμως, δεν πρόλαβε να ολοκληρωσει και την (ενορχήστρωση της ) 7 του . 
Schubert/Newbould: Symphony No.7 in E minor
Symphony No. 7 (Schubert)FWikipediaFranz Peter Schubert drafted a four-movement symphony in E major (D 729) in August 1821 but, though the work (which comprises about 1350 bars[1]) is structurally complete, he only orchestrated the slow introduction and the first 110 bars of the first movement.[2] The rest of the work is however continued on 14-stave score pages as a melodic line with occasional basses or counterpoints, giving clues as to changes in orchestral texture. The movements are:Schubert/Weingartner Symphony No.7 in E major[3]Adagio ma non troppo - AllegroAndanteScherzo: Allegro decisoAllegro vivaceSchubert/Newbould Symphony No.7 in E major/minor[4][5]Adagio - AllegroAndanteScherzo: AllegroAllegro giustoSchubert seems to have laid the symphony aside in order to work on his opera Alfonso und Estrella, and never returned to it. The manuscript was given by Schubert's brother Ferdinand to Felix Mendelssohn and was subsequently acquired by Sir George Grove, who bequeathed it to the Royal College of Music in London. There are at least three completions - by John Francis Barnett (1881), Felix Weingartner (1934)[6] and Brian Newbould (1981).[7] The work is now generally accepted to be Schubert's Seventh Symphony,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] an appellation which some scholars had preferred to leave for the chimerical 'Gastein Symphony' that was long believed to have been written and lost in 1824.
Symphony No. 7 (Schubert) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._7_(Schubert)
Schubert - F. Weingartner (1934) Symphony No 7 in E major D 729 - 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j95oSmx0os&feature=share&list=PLDED7CC81F9FEF4B1
Schubert - F. Weingartner (1934) Symphony No 7 in E major D 729 - 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAFznN_Bq6Q&feature=share&list=PLDED7CC81F9FEF4B1
Schubert - F. Weingartner (1934) Symphony No 7 in E major D 729 - 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CERf-dzoPo&feature=share&list=PLDED7CC81F9FEF4B1
Schubert - F. Weingartner (1934) Symphony No 7 in E major D 729 - 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6x49JHuucE&feature=share&list=PLDED7CC81F9FEF4B1


*Christos Sipsis
 Η δευτερη -και πιο γνωστη ημιτελής του- ειναι η περιφημη 8η συμφωνια του. Την ακούμε από την Berlin Philharmonic σε διευθυνση Wilhelm Furtwängler.
Furtwängler Schubert Unfinished Symphony No. 8
http://youtu.be/ZHajIDHr4Cc
Franz Schubert's Symphony No. 8 in B minor (sometimes renumbered as Symphony No. 7,[1] in accordance with the Neue Schubert-Ausgabe [2]), commonly known as the "Unfinished Symphony" (German: Unvollendete), D.759, was started in 1822 but left with only two movements known to be complete, even though Schubert would live for another six years. A scherzo, nearly completed in piano score but with only two pages orchestrated, also survives. It has long been theorized that Schubert may have sketched a finale which instead became the big B minor entr'acte from his incidental music to Rosamunde, but all the evidence for this is circumstantial.[3] One possible reason for Schubert's leaving the symphony incomplete is the predominance of the same meter (three-in-a-bar). The first movement is in 3/4, the second in 3/8 and the third (an incomplete scherzo) also in 3/4. Three consecutive movements in basically the same meter rarely occur in symphonies, sonatas or chamber works of the great Viennese composers. Haydn's Farewell Symphony has been cited as a notable exception; but its finale, though ending with a 3/4 Andante in which all the instruments drop out one by one leaving two duetting solo violinists ending the work in F-sharp major, starts with an orthodox sonata-allegro in the tonic F-sharp minor in common (i.e., duple) time transitioning after the recapitulation to the unorthodox extended slow 3/4 "Farewell" coda in modified sonata form.The Unfinished, third movement, Facsimile, 1885, In J. R. von Herbeck’s BiographySchubert’s Eighth is sometimes called the first Romantic symphony due to its emphasis on expressive melody, vivid harmony and creative combinations of orchestral tone color despite the architecturally imposing Classical sonata-form structures of its two completed movements highlighted by the dramatically climactic development section of the first movement based solely on its quietly sinister opening theme.To this day, musicologists still disagree as to why Schubert failed to complete the symphony; or even whether he did fail to complete it.[4] Some have speculated that he stopped working on it in the middle of the scherzo in the fall of 1822 because it was associated in his mind with the initial outbreak of syphilis, or simply that he was distracted by the inspiration for his Wanderer Fantasie for solo piano which occupied his time and energy immediately afterward; or perhaps a combination of both factors.
Schubert/Newbould: Symphony No.8

youtu.be/Zxj8UIjrLx4
Modern completions... recently, British musicologists Gerald Abraham and Brian Newbould have also offered completions of the symphony (scherzo and finale) using Schubert's scherzo sketch and the extended B minor entr'acte from his incidental music to the play Rosamunde Schubert wrote a few months later, long suspected by some musicologists as originally intended as the "Unfinished"'s finale.[3] (In fact, it was even played as the finale as long ago as the British premiere of the symphony on 6 April 1867.) Its first movement, the scherzo sketch and the entr-acte are all in B minor, their instrumentation is the same, and the entr'acte (like the first movement) is in sonata-form (as are all Schubert's symphonic finales) and in a very similar style and mood. If the entr'acte indeed started life as the finale of this symphony, then Schubert evidently recycled it (probably at that stage unorchestrated) from the symphony to the incidental music, presumably orchestrating it for the play and perhaps making compositional changes.
Symphony No. 8 (Schubert) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._8_(Schubert)




Felix von Weingartner "Symphony No 6" (2. Mov.)
http://youtu.be/MVjvKIyRAGk








In 1927–28, Felix Weingartner, better known as a great classical conductor who was the first to record all nine Beethoven symphonies (divided between London and Vienna) and the second (after Stokowski in Philadelphia) to record all four of Brahms (in London), composed his Sixth Symphony, La Tragica (in memory of 19 November 1828 [the day Schubert died)), as a tribute to Schubert on the centenary of his death. The second movement of Weingartner's symphony is a realization of Schubert's incomplete sketch of the scherzo seventy years before Newbould's independent effort that has been preserved on CD (unlike Weingartner's, at least as of February 2013). 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._8_(Schubert)



*...και το τριτο συμφωνικό εργο που αφησε ημιτελες ο μεγαλος ρομαντικός που, αν και πεθανε τοσο νεος, πρόλαβε να μας αφησει ενα κυριολεκτικα τεραστιο, τόσο σε όγκο όσο και -κυριως- σε αξια, εργο.Πρόκειται για τη 10η συμφωνια του, την οποία αφησε σε κατασταση προσχεδιου . Το προσχεδιο μετετρεψε σε εργο (δεν χρησιμοποιώ το ρημα "συμπληρωσε" γιατι δεν αποδιδει την πραγματικότητα) ο Brian Newbould .

Schubert/Newbould: Symphony No.10
http://youtu.be/C494B1lKslI
N. Marriner Schubert's Symphony No. 10 in D major, D.936a, is an unfinished work that survives in a partly fragmentary piano sketch. Only properly identified in the 1970s, it has been orchestrated by Brian Newbould in a conjectural completion that has subsequentlybeen performed, published and recorded.The sketch appears to date from the last weeks of the composer's life, in October–November 1828, and is presumed to be the Last Symphony (Letzte Symphonie) mentioned by his friend Eduard von Bauernfeld in an appreciation of Schubert published in the Wiener Zeitschrift für Kunst, Literatur, Theater und Mode for 13 June 1829.[1]The symphony was evidently planned, unlike any of Schubert's other symphonies, in three movements:No tempo marking (Allegro maestoso in Newbould's edition); D majorAndante; B minor/ majorScherzo (Allegro moderato in Newbould's edition); D major.Despite the title 'scherzo', the remarkable third movement, which is extremely contrapuntal in texture and includes extended fugal passages, appears to be a compound movement performing the functions of both scherzo and finale. The most fully preserved movement is the Andante, an impressively solemn, slow-march invention which has been seen as anticipating Gustav Mahler.[2] There are about 30 instrumental indications in Schubert's sketch which confirm that the orchestra to be employed was similar in size to the Eighth and Ninth symphonies, with a trio of trombones which make impressive contributions in the first two movements.The music of the symphony appears to some extent exploratory and contains unusual elements, notably the hybrid form of the third movement and the highly contrapuntal nature of much of the material. Sketches for the third movement are intermingled with several counterpoint exercises, which suggests that it is related in some way to the one counterpoint lesson Schubert lived to take from Simon Sechter a few weeks before his death at 31 from typhus on November 19, 1828.Πηγή:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No.10_(Schubert)

 Η συνθεση Rendering του Luciano Berio στηριζεται στις σημειωσεις του Σούμπερτ για τη 10η συμφωνια του.Προτεινω να την ακούσετε . Ειναι μια συνθεση πολύ ευκολη και ευχαριστη και αποδεικνυει ότι οι (πειραματιστες) συνθετες του μοντερνισμου ήξεραν μια χαρα να συνθετουν "κλασικα", αντιθετα απο ότι λενε διαφοροι πολέμιοί τους. 


Luciano Berio: Rendering (1989)
http://youtu.be/NQB5bFTwHfI
 Rendering is a 1989/1990 composition by the Italian composer Luciano Berio. Cast in three movements for full orchestra, it takes as its structure the fragmentary score of Schubert's uncompleted D major symphony, D936a.The work lasts for around 33 minutes. Its first two movements were completed in 1989 and first performed in June of that year, with Nikolaus Harnoncourt conducting the Concertgebouw Orchestra in Amsterdam. The third movement followed early the next year, and all three movements were played together for the first time in April 1990 under Riccardo Chailly, also in Amsterdam.Berio leaves Schubert's original parts intact, entering the score only where there are gaps or partial work. As the title suggests, Berio fulfils a function close to that of a builder completing a house: his contributions fill the gaps like mortar fills the spaces in between the solid structure. Berio uses Schubertian motifs and quotes from the existing score, but in doing so emphasises the chasms in the score rather than attempting to smooth the interruptions away. As Giordano Montecchi statesSchubert's fragments give rise to musical moments of vertiginous beauty which nevertheless constantly founder in the emptiness of what was "not done" - and Berio fills this emptiness with... an iridescent musical screed woven around the timbre of the celesta... separating the fragments and at the same time holding them together, enabling them to reach the symphonic goal for which they were intended..."[1]Unlike pieces such as the various editions of Gustav Mahler's fragmentary Tenth Symphony, or Brian Newbould's conjectural orchestration of the Schubert, Rendering is intended as a completed work in its own right, rather than a 'performing version' of Schubert's Tenth.Rendering has proved one of Berio's most enduring pieces and has been recorded several times, twice by Chailly alone. When illness caused the Italian maestro to withdraw from performances in Munich in 2011, David Robertson took over and the result was a new reading and recording by the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra.Πηγή:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendering_(Berio)

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ BEETHOVEN ~




  ~ BEETHOVEN ~





*Christos Sipsis

Σιγουρα πολλοι απο εσας δεν ξερετε ότι -υποτιθεται τουλαχιστο ότι- ο Μποετοβεν ειχε ξεκινησει μια ακόμη συμφωνια... την 10 του... Καποια σπαραγματα - προσχεδια αυτης της υποτιθεμενης συμφωνιας βρηκε ο Barry Cooper και τα επεξεργαστηκε. Ιδου το αποτελεσμα:







Beethoven. Sinfonia N° 10. Andante - allegro - andante.wmv
http://youtu.be/5qWSpVt9oaM





 Symphony No. 10 (Beethoven/Cooper)WikipediaLudwig van Beethoven's Symphony No. 10 in E flat major is a hypothetical work, assembled by Barry Cooper from Beethoven's fragmentary sketches. This title is controversial since it cannot be proven that all the sketches assembled were meant for the same piece. There is consensus, however, that Beethoven did intend another symphony.BackgroundAfter completing the Ninth Symphony, he devoted his energies largely to composing string quartets, although there are contemporary references to some work on a symphony (e.g. in a Beethoven letter of 18 March 1827); allegedly he played a movement of this piece for his friend Karl Holz, whose description of what he heard matches the material assembled by Cooper. Cooper claimed that he found over fifty separate fragments, which he wove together to form the symphonic movement. Cooper assembled material for a first movement consisting of an Andante in E-flat major enclosing a central Allegro in C minor. Cooper claims to have also found sketches for a Scherzo which are not developed enough to assemble into a performing version.There are numerous references to this work in Beethoven's correspondence (originally, he had planned the Ninth Symphony to be entirely instrumental, the Ode to Joy to be a separate cantata, and the Tenth Symphony to conclude with a different vocal work).Earlier, in 1814–15, Beethoven also began sketches for a 6th piano concerto in D major, Hess 15. (Unlike the fragmentary symphony, the first movement of this concerto was partly written out in full score and a reconstruction by Nicholas Cook has been performed and recorded.)OtherJohannes Brahms's First Symphony is sometimes referred to as "Beethoven's Tenth Symphony", after a remark by Hans von Bülow.[2][3] Both the Brahms work and Cooper's realisation of Beethoven's sketches feature C-minor 6/8 Allegros.
Symphony No. 10 (Beethoven/Cooper) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._10_(Beethoven/Cooper)


***

Μερικες φορες η 1η του Μπραμς αναφερεται ως 10 του Μπετοβεν για λογους που θα δειτε στο επομενο σχόλιο.Την ακουμε με τον Bruno Walter
Brahms Symphony 1, Bruno Walter and Columbia Symphony Orchestra
http://youtu.be/-wzHj0CylLs
The Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 68, is a symphony written by Johannes Brahms. Brahms spent at least fourteen years completing this work, whose sketches date from 1854. Brahms himself declared that the symphony, from sketches to finishing touches, took 21 years, from 1855 to 1876. The premiere of this symphony, conducted by the composer's friend Felix Otto Dessoff, occurred on November 4, 1876, in Karlsruhe, then in the Grand Duchy of Baden. A typical performance lasts between 45 and 50 minutes.....The conductor Hans von Bülow was moved in 1877 to call the symphony "Beethoven's Tenth", due to perceived similarities between the work and various compositions of Beethoven.[3] It is often remarked that there is a strong resemblance between the main theme of the finale of Brahms' First Symphony and the main theme of the finale of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. Also, Brahms uses the rhythm of the "fate" motto from the opening of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony. This rather annoyed Brahms; he felt that this amounted to accusations of plagiarism, whereas he saw his use of Beethoven's idiom in this symphony as an act of conscious homage. Brahms himself said, when comment was made on the similarity with Beethoven, "any ass can see that."[4] Nevertheless, this work is still often referred to as
"Beethoven's Tenth".[5] However, Brahms' horn theme, with the "fate" rhythm, was noted in a letter to Clara Schumann (dated 1868), overheard in an alphorn's playing.[6]...The long violin solo is reminiscent of some of Beethoven's later works: the late quartets and Missa Solemnis. The third, scherzo-like movement, has an easy spirit yet is full of complex rhythms and interwoven textures.The fourth movement begins with a slow introduction, where a new melody competes with "gloomy dramatic rhetoric."[2] In the Piu andante section, the horns and timpani introduce a tune that Brahms heard from an Alpine shepherd with the words, "High on the hill, deep in the dale, I send you a thousand greetings!"[2] This movement contains melodies reminiscent of Beethoven symphony No. 9. The last section—Allegro non troppo, ma con brio—contains a grand melody in a major key, as the novel, Beethoven-like main subject of the grand finale
Symphony No. 1 (Brahms) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphony_No._1_(Brahms)

ΗΜΙΤΕΛΕΙΣ ΣΥΜΦΩΝΙΕΣ ~ TCHAIKOVSKY ~







~ TCHAIKOVSKY~








*Christos Sipsis


Μια απο τις σχετικα γνωστες ημιτελεις ειναι η 7η του Τσαϊκόφσκι. Την ξεκινησε μετα την 5η (την προοριζε για εκτη) αλλα την εγκατελειψε. Γυρω στα μισα του 20ου αιωνα ο Semyon Bogatyrev ολοκληρωσε την συνθεση της στηριζόμενος στις σημειωσεις του Ρώσου συνθετη.

Wikipedia, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky's Symphony in E-flat, was commenced after the Symphony No. 5, and was intended initially to be the composer's next (i.e. sixth) symphony. Tchaikovsky abandoned this work in 1892, only to reuse the first movement in the single-movement Third Piano Concerto, Op. 75, first performed and published after his death in 1895. Two other movements were reworked for piano and orchestra by Sergei Taneyev as the Andante and Finale, which was published as Tchaikovsky's Op. posth. 79 in 1897.
Between 1951 and 1955, Soviet composer Semyon Bogatyrev reconstructed the symphony from Tchaikovsky's sketches and various re-workings. This version was premiered on February 7, 1957, in Moscow by the Moscow Region Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Mikhail Terian, and was published by the State Music Publishers in Moscow in 1961. It was first recorded by the Philadelphia Orchestra under Eugene Ormandy in 1962, soon after they gave the U.S. premiere of the work (February 16, 1962).
The Bogatyrev reconstruction follows the traditional four-movement pattern:
Allegro brillanteThis movement was used for the Third Piano Concerto, Op. posth. 75.AndanteBogatyryev used the Andante from the Andante and Finale for Piano and Orchestra, Op. posth. 79, which had been constructed from Tchaikovsky's sketches by Sergei Taneyev. More recently, it was reused as the slow movement of a projected Cello Concerto.Scherzo: Vivace assaiPerceiving that Tchaikovsky would have written a scherzo for this symphony, Bogatyryev orchestrated this piece from Tchaikovsky's Scherzo-Fantasie, Op. 72, No. 10.Finale: Allegro maestosoBogatyryev used the Finale from the Andante and Finale.
Tchaikovsky Symphony E-flat no.7-1 (part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDBzRXW2tk4&feature=share&list=PL224D83D97100993B
Eugene Ormandy and the Philadelphia Orchestra gave the American premiere on February 16, 1962, and made the world premiere recording for Columbia Records soon afterwards. The original LPs were released in stereo as MS 6349 and in mono as ML 5749. This recording was later digitally remastered and issued on CD.[1] Only six other conductors have recorded it: Neeme Järvi, Sergei Skripka, Gennady Rozhdestvensky, Kyung-Soo Won, Kees Bakels, and Leo Ginzburg.[2]
Tchaikovsky Symphony E-flat no.7-2 (part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOOmoi9fPhY&feature=share&list=PL224D83D97100993BThe need to write ..."I literally cannot live without working," Tchaikovsky once wrote to the Grand Duke Konstantin Konstantinovich, "For no sooner has some labor been completed ... there appears a desire to begin at once on some new labor.... [U]nder such circumstances this new labor is not always provoked by true creative necessity."[3]
By November 1889, Tchaikovsky's creative itch was becoming extreme. A year had passed since completing the Fifth Symphony, and eight months since writing another musical composition. Tchaikovsky confided to the Grand Duke that he had long aspired to crown his creative career with a grand symphony on some as yet undefined programme, but it was evidently on his return voyage from America in May 1891 that he jotted down a few preliminary ideas for what might become such a piece. More important still was a programme he roughed out, possibly at the same time: "The ultimate essence ... of the symphony is Life. First part – all impulse, passion, confidence, thirst for activity. Must be short (the finale death – result of collapse). Second part love: third disappointments; fourth ends dying away (also short)."[4]
During the following months, while at work on The Nutcracker and Iolanta, he continued to note down further materials, but when at last he began systematic work on the piece, many of these and earlier ideas were discarded; nor was the programme to be used. Others were drawn in, however, and by June 8, 1892, both the first movement and the finale were fully sketched. He had hoped to continue work in July and August, but further composition was delayed until October. Nevertheless, by November 4, 1892 the entire symphony was sketched, and within three days the first movement was scored up to the recapitulation.[5]
Tchaikovsky had already offered to conduct the premiere of the symphony at a charity concert in Moscow the following February. However, after another enforced break, the composer took another look at the sketches and experienced total disenchantment. "It's composed simply for the sake of composing something; there's nothing at all interesting or sympathetic in it," he wrote to his nephew Vladimir "Bob" Davydov on December 16, 1892. "I've decided to discard and forget it ... Perhaps," he added, though how he can hardly have realized how precisely, "the subject still has the potential to stir my imagination."[5]
Davydov's response came quickly and, to the composer's surprise, very strongly worded. In a letter dated December 19, 1892, Davydov wrote, "I feel sorry of course, for the symphony that you have cast down from the cliff as they used to do with the children of Sparta, because it seemed to you deformed, whereas it is probably as much a work of genius as the first five."[6]



Tchaikovsky Symphony E-flat no.7-2 (part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiUDd_IN17U&feature=share&list=PL224D83D97100993B
... vs. the need to expressTchaikovsky gave up on the symphony because he now found the music impersonal, lacking the introspection he felt a symphony needed. He had no wish to continue making, as he said, "meaningless harmonies and a rhythmical scheme expressive of nothing".[7]
However, Davydov's comments spurred Tchaikovsky to reuse the sketches instead of totally writing them off.[8] The music may have meant nothing to him on a personal level emotionally, but that did not mean it was worthless. The main theme was highly attractive, skillfully worked out, extroverted. When worked out by a composer whose handling of such a theme could become a delight to hear and, for the musicologist, to analyze, the results could become extremely worthwhile after all.[9]
More importantly, the composer did not abandon the thought of writing a new symphony based on the program he conceived. Though his efforts with the E-flat symphony did not turn out as planned, they influenced his conception of what would become the 6th Symphony (Pathétique), the first movement of which was fully sketched less than six weeks later, by 9 February 1893.
By April 1893, Tchaikovsky had also decided to rescore the E-flat Symphony as a piano concerto, his third. In June he did preliminary work on this project, while simultaneously pushing ahead with work on the 6th Symphony. By August he had decided the concerto was too long, and he wrote to Alexander Siloti saying that he would publish just the first movement, under the title of Allegro de concert or Conzertstuck. The 6th symphony was finished by the end of August. On 6 October he wrote to Zygmunt Stojowski, "I am now working on the scoring of my new (third) concerto for our dear Diémer. When you see him, please tell him that when I proceeded to work on it, I realized that this concerto is of depressing and threatening length. Consequently I decided to leave only part one which in itself will constitute an entire concerto. The work will only improve the more since the last two parts were not worth very much". Three days later, in a letter to Bob Davydov (the dedicatee of the 6th Symphony), he again referred to the work as a concerto. By 15 October 1893 he had completely finished the recomposition. A note on the manuscript reads, "The end, God be thanked". But the last page was notated "End of movement 1", which has caused considerable speculation ever since. Had he decided that the 3rd Piano Concerto would have the usual three movements after all, but fate intervened before he could complete this work? The record favours the interpretation that he had decided on a single-movement concerto, despite the irregularity of this approach. Three weeks later, and only eight days after conducting the first performance of the 6th Symphony, which he had permitted after its premiere to be known as the Pathétique, Tchaikovsky was dead.
The one-movement Piano Concerto No. 3, Op. 75, Tchaikovsky's last completed composition, was published by Jurgenson the following year. It had its premiere in January 1895, with Sergei Taneyev as the soloist.After considerable discussion between 1894 and 1896 between Tchaikovsky's brother Modest, Taneyev, Siloti, the publisher Belyayev and others, it was decided that Taneyev would convert two of the E-flat Symphony's abandoned three remaining movements into piano-and-orchestra form, starting with the very brief sketches Tchaikovsky had made along these lines before deciding not to proceed beyond the first movement. The Andante and Finale was premiered in January 1897, again with Taneyev at the piano. It was published later that year by Belyayev as Tchaikovsky's Op. 79, even though it was arguably as much Taneyev's composition as Tchaikovsky's. The 3rd Piano Concerto and the Andante and Finale are sometimes played and recorded together to constitute a full three-movement piano concerto, even though this was almost certainly not Tchaikovsky's final intention.
Tchaikovsky Symphony E-flat no.7-3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUGGOZOdFOU&feature=share&list=PL224D83D97100993B
 Bogatyrev reconstructionA reconstruction of the original symphony from the sketches and various reworkings was accomplished during 1951–1955 by the Soviet composer Semyon Bogatyrev, who brought the symphony into finished, fully orchestrated form and issued the score as Tchaikovsky's "Symphony No 7 in E-flat major."[10]<a href="#" role=button>Bogatyrev utilized primary sources, including Tchaikovsky's initial rough sketches, the full orchestral manuscript of about half of the first movement, and the manuscript and printed score of the 3rd Piano Concerto. The one-movement piano concerto was fully orchestrated by the composer, while the second and fourth movements were later orchestrated by Sergei Taneyev, Tchaikovsky's friend and fellow composer.</a><a href="#" role=button>While the first movement sketches and completed version for piano and orchestra were essentially complete, Bogatyrev found that only 81 of the 204 bars of the second movement were in Tchaikovsky's hand. Here he utilized 


Tchaikovsky's piano score for the Andante for Piano and Orchestra, Taneyev's orchestration, and a very rough draft by Tchaikovsky.For the third movement, Bogatyrev followed the insistence of the composer's brother Modest that this should be a scherzo, and orchestrated a scherzo from Tchaikovsky's Op. 72 piano pieces, as well as more sketches by the composer. Remarkably, the piece fits neatly between the second and fourth movements and even includes final chords that are echoed by the beginning of the fourth movement.The reconstruction of the fourth movement was based on the piano score for the Finale for Piano and Orchestra, the composer's sketches, and the published orchestration by Taneyev.Bogatyrev reconstructionA reconstruction of the original symphony from the sketches and various reworkings was accomplished during 1951–1955 by the Soviet composer Semyon Bogatyrev, who brought the symphony into finished, fully orchestrated form and issued the score as Tchaikovsky's "Symphony No 7 in E-flat major."[10]Bogatyrev utilized primary sources, including Tchaikovsky's initial rough sketches, the full orchestral manuscript of about half of the first movement, and the manuscript and printed score of the 3rd Piano Concerto. The one-movement piano concerto was fully orchestrated by the composer, while the second and fourth movements were later orchestrated by Sergei Taneyev, Tchaikovsky's friend and fellow composer.While the first movement sketches and completed version for piano and orchestra were essentially complete, Bogatyrev found that only 81 of the 204 bars of the second movement were in Tchaikovsky's hand. Here he utilized Tchaikovsky's piano score for the Andante for Piano and Orchestra, Taneyev's orchestration, and a very rough draft by Tchaikovsky.For the third movement, Bogatyrev followed the insistence of the composer's brother Modest that this should be a scherzo, and orchestrated a scherzo from Tchaikovsky's Op. 72 piano pieces, as well as more sketches by the composer. Remarkably, the piece fits neatly between the second and fourth movements and even includes final chords that are echoed by the beginning of the fourth movement.
The reconstruction of the fourth movement was based on the piano score for the Finale for Piano and Orchestra, the composer's sketches, and the published orchestration by Taneyev. 
Symphony in E flat (Tchaikovsky) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tchaikovsky Symphony E-flat no.7-4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH54CVDdLYo&feature=share&list=PL224D83D97100993B
ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΜΕΝΟ
Tchaikovsky Sinfonia N 7
http://youtu.be/Xa3QRV3sxYY</a>